Department of Legal Affairs, India – Policy Update 2025

Background

The Department of Legal Affairs (DLA), a key branch of the Ministry of Law & Justice, provides legal advice to the Union Government, manages central litigation, oversees notarial administration, and coordinates international legal assistance. Its mandate rooted in the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961 covers constitutional interpretation, treaty matters, government representation before courts, and administration under statutes such as the Notaries Act, 1952. Over time, the department has grown from a primarily advisory secretariat into an operationally active unit with branch secretariats in major metros and a nationwide litigation management system.

Two practical needs shaped this evolution. First, central ministries require timely, authoritative legal guidance to design policy and defend actions in court. Second, the Union’s growing litigation portfolio called for institutional arrangements to track cases, deploy counsel, and monitor outcomes systematically. Citizens and the public administration both benefit when legal risk is identified early and litigation is handled consistently; DLA’s role, therefore, sits at the intersection of legal quality, administrative efficiency, and constitutional safeguarding.

Functioning

DLA operates through distinct but interlinked functions: advisory work, litigation management, notary administration, and international coordination.

Advisory work begins when ministries send requests for legal opinion – on draft legislation, contractual clauses, regulatory interpretation, or constitutional questions. The department processes these requests, issues considered legal opinions, and, when required, drafts or refines legislative text. For litigation, DLA implements the Central Agency Scheme: it maintains panels of counsel, files and defends matters on behalf of the Union in the Supreme Court, High Courts and lower courts, and uses its branch secretariats to handle regional cases.

A significant operational innovation is the Legal Information & Management Briefing System (LIMBS), DLA’s digital repository and case-management tool. LIMBS aggregates case data across courts, records counsel assignments, and provides dashboards for senior officials to assess litigation exposure and lawyer performance. The department also functions as India’s central authority for cross-border legal cooperation under conventions governing service of process and judicial assistance.

This institutional design is pragmatic: centralized policy and quality control (in New Delhi) combined with decentralized case handling (branch secretariats). It aims to ensure legal consistency while allowing for regionally tailored litigation strategies.

Performance 

Performance assessment of a legal-advice agency differs from program evaluation. Observable indicators include caseload coverage, digital integration, branch expansion, and procedural timeliness.

DLA’s public records show steady digitization: LIMBS has consolidated hundreds of thousands of matter entries. As reported, LIMBS captured approximately 787,000 court cases across more than 3,200 courts and some 20,600 government-appointed advocates by 2022 – an indicator of improved tracking compared with earlier fragmented records. The department has continued to expand its branch secretariats and the roster of panel counsel to meet a growing and geographically dispersed litigation load.

Annual reports for 2022-24 document routine advisory output, notary administration statistics, and international cooperation activity. The DLA has processed several thousand Hague-Convention requests and routine notarial matters annually. At the same time, the department has published guidance and consolidated advice on emerging areas such as arbitration policy, treaty interpretation, and administrative procedure.

However, the publicly available data remain limited in several respects: year-on-year trends for advisory turnaround times, rates of favorable litigation outcomes, counsel cost-effectiveness, and the proportion of matters resolved without protracted hearings are not routinely disclosed. These gaps make rigorous performance benchmarking difficult.

Impact

The DLA’s contribution to governance is primarily institutional rather than visible as service delivery to end-users. Sound legal advice reduces the risk of avoidable litigation, helps ministries draft more robust regulations, and supports coherent policy implementation. By centralizing litigation management and deploying LIMBS, the department has enabled more systematic counsel assignment and improved oversight, which in turn can reduce contradictory legal positions taken by different wings of government.

In the legal profession, DLA’s administration of notaries and the operation of counsel panels set professional standards and channels for government engagement with private advocates. Its role as the central authority for international legal cooperation facilitates cross-border dispute resolution and the execution of foreign judicial instruments – matters that increasingly affect commerce, intellectual property, and family law in a globalized economy.

Nonetheless, the absence of transparent outcome metrics limits a full assessment of societal impact, for example, how much litigation is avoided through early advice, or the extent to which DLA interventions save public funds by preventing adverse judgments.

Emerging issues and recommendations

1. Capacity imbalance across ministries. Several departments rely extensively on DLA for routine legal questions. 

Recommendation: develop in-house legal desks within ministries and introduce a triage mechanism that reserves DLA for high-risk, precedent-setting, or interstate matters.

2. Backlog and prioritization. The sheer volume of cases demands sharper prioritization. 

Recommendation: adopt risk-based case triage in LIMBS, whereby cases with major fiscal or constitutional exposure receive expedited counsel allocation.

3. Limited public transparency. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are not publicly reported. 

Recommendation: publish an annual litigation dashboard with anonymized metrics – cases handled, dispositions, average time to resolution, counsel costs, and rates of reversal, balancing confidentiality and accountability.

4. Need for specialist legal capacity. Emerging policy domains – data protection, AI governance, climate litigation require specialized legal expertise. 

Recommendation: Create specialist clusters within DLA and expand panel counsel with domain experts.

5. Coordination with state legal machinery. Complex litigations often involve state governments and central agencies. 

Recommendation: institutionalize intergovernmental legal coordination protocols and shared LIMBS access for joint cases.

6. Better use of analytics. LIMBS contains rich data that can guide strategic interventions. 

Recommendation: Develop predictive analytics to identify high-risk cases and optimize resource deployment.

Way forward

DLA’s future role must combine preventive legal strategy with agile litigation management. Preventive lawyering early, sector-specific legal inputs into policy design reduces exposure and improves regulatory outcomes. Strengthening LIMBS into an analytically driven system that ranks litigation risk, measures counsel performance, and reports outcomes will transform DLA from a reactive defender to a proactive legal strategist.

To sustain this transformation, DLA should publish concise performance reports, invest in specialist legal teams, expand ministry-level legal capacity, and deepen collaboration with state counterparts. Doing so will not only make government action more legally resilient but also improve public trust in administrative decision-making.

References

  1. Department of Legal Affairs. (n.d.). About the department. Government of India. https://legalaffairs.gov.in/About-us/About-the-department
  2. Department of Legal Affairs. (n.d.). Functions of the sections. Government of India. https://legalaffairs.gov.in/functions-sections
  3. Department of Legal Affairs. (2023–24). Annual Report 2023–24. Government of India. https://legalaffairs.gov.in/annual-report 

About the contributor

Bavleen, Research Intern at IMPRI, pursuing Economics Honors from Sri Guru Gobind Singh College of Commerce, Delhi University.

Acknowledgment: The author sincerely thanks Ms. Aasthaba Jadeja and the IMPRI team for their valuable support.

Disclaimer: All views expressed in the article belong solely to the author and not necessarily to the organisation.

Read More at IMPRI:

India’s Engagement in UN Peacekeeping Operations- Under Viksit Bharat Mission

The Digital MSME (Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises) Scheme – 2017

Author

Talk to Us