A Scheme for Promotion of Innovation, Rural Industries and Entrepreneurship (ASPIRE), 2015

Policy Update
Aditi Natasha Bhuinyan

Background

The ASPIRE Scheme (A Scheme for Promotion of Innovation, Rural Industries and Entrepreneurship) was launched on 16 March 2015 by the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises to promote entrepreneurship, innovation and employment in the agro-rural sector (Ministry of MSME(MoMSME), 2022).

India’s rural economy continues to face challenges such as underemployment, stagnant rural incomes and limited opportunities for industrial development. Due to limited non-farm opportunities, there is a need to use local resources and skills to diversify economic activities and generate employment. But aspiring entrepreneurs often face barriers such as inadequate access to finance, limited access to machinery and insufficient technical support.

Against this backdrop, ASPIRE Scheme was introduced to develop an entrepreneurial ecosystem that encourages innovation, promotes rural industries and supports employment generation (MoMSME, n.d.). It focuses on accelerating innovative solutions to economic and social needs and generating livelihood opportunities. Its approach recognises the role of micro, small and medium enterprises in achieving this target.

ASPIRE has two broad categories of beneficiaries. The first comprises eligible institutions that receive financial assistance from the Ministry of MSME to establish and operate incubation facilities. The second includes aspiring entrepreneurs, particularly rural youth, who benefit from skill development, practical training, access to incubation infrastructure and support for enterprise creation or employment.

At its inception, the scheme was structured around three components: Livelihood Business Incubators (LBIs), Technology Business Incubators (TBIs) and a Fund of Funds. These components were designed to support livelihood-oriented entrepreneurship, technology-based innovation and investment in eligible enterprises (MoMSME, 2022).

The scheme underwent revisions to its implementation framework over time. The revised guidelines provided for its continuation during 2021–22 to 2025–26, with an approved outlay of ₹194.87 crore and a target of establishing 125 LBIs (MoMSME, 2022). The TBI component was discontinued as a separate component following its convergence with the Ministry of MSME’s Incubation Scheme (MoMSME, 2023). Meanwhile, the Fund of Funds continued to facilitate investment in eligible enterprises through financial intermediaries 

Functioning

The Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises provides the overall policy framework for ASPIRE by formulating scheme guidelines, approving eligible proposals and overseeing implementation. The scheme operates through designated institutions and implementing agencies that facilitate the establishment and functioning of Livelihood Business Incubators (LBIs). These institutions provide aspiring entrepreneurs, particularly in rural and underserved areas, with access to skill development, technical training and incubation support.

The ASPIRE Scheme is structured around three major components which are:

1. Livelihood Business Incubators (LBIs): 

LBIs are physical infrastructure facilities operated by host institutions, including universities, colleges, and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Equipped with government-funded plants and machinery, these incubators function as local enterprise development hubs. They provide technical training in machinery operation, support low-cost prototyping, and offer mentorship on business compliance, enterprise scaling, and access to credit (MoMSME, 2022).

2. Technology Business Incubators (TBIs):

The TBI component has been officially discontinued due to its convergence with the main MSME Incubation Scheme. Earlier its focus was to foster and scale up technology-driven, innovative enterprises in the agricultural and rural sectors. But any TBI approved under ASPIRE prior to 31 March 2021 continue to receive financial assistance and are still monitored as per previous guidelines (MoMSME, 2023).

3. Startup Promotion Support (The Fund of Funds): 

Administered by the Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI), this component ensures that agro-rural enterprises have access to risk capital when traditional bank loans are unavailable. Instead of directly financing individual entrepreneurs, SIDBI utilises a ₹310 Crore ASPIRE Fund and channels this capital into SEBI-registered Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs). They target early-stage rural innovators and scalable startups which require support to develop and scale technology.

Implementation and Budgetary Outlay 

The scheme has a total budgetary outlay of ₹194.87 crore for the 2021–26 period, with a target of establishing 125 Livelihood Business Incubators (LBIs) (MoMSME, 2022). The total budgetary outlay is routed through two pathways: infrastructure funding (for setting up incubation spaces) and a Fund of Funds mechanism (to inject capital into startups).

Under the LBI component, financial assistance is provided for eligible plant and machinery costs, excluding land and buildings. Government agencies and eligible public institutions can receive grants covering 100% of the eligible cost, capped at ₹100 Lakhs (₹1 Crore) per incubator. Private agencies and projects implemented through the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) mode can receive grants covering 75% of the eligible cost, capped at ₹75 Lakhs per incubator (MoMSME, 2022).

The Fund of Funds component, managed by SIDBI, aims to facilitate equity investments in scalable startups, particularly those operating in the agro-rural sector. Its corpus was increased by ₹250 crore from the initial allocation of ₹60 crore, bringing the total corpus to ₹310 crore (MoMSME, 2023). Under this mechanism, SIDBI channels funds through alternative investment funds (AIFs), which are required to invest at least twice the amount received in micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), with at least an equivalent amount directed towards agro-rural startups. According to SIDBI’s Annual Report 2024–25, SIDBI has committed ₹217.50 crore to partner venture funds.

Overall, ASPIRE combines incubation infrastructure, skill development and financial support to promote rural entrepreneurship. Through its LBI component, the scheme aims to equip aspiring entrepreneurs with the skills and resources needed to establish enterprises, while the Fund of Funds facilitates access to investment for eligible start-ups. The scheme’s effectiveness ultimately depends on whether these interventions lead to functional businesses, sustainable employment and improved rural livelihoods.

Performance

The ASPIRE Scheme has established a significant network of incubation facilities to promote rural entrepreneurship and employment generation. According to the Ministry of MSME’s ASPIRE Performance Smartboard, 109 Livelihood Business Incubators (LBIs) have been approved across 27 States and Union Territories, with 82 reported as functional. The scheme has trained 1,23,526 beneficiaries through its incubation network, reflecting its reach in providing skill development and entrepreneurial support (MoMSME, 2026).

Table 1: ASPIRE LBI Performance

Source: Ministry of MSME, ASPIRE Performance Smartboard, as 1 October 2026.

For the 2021–22 to 2025–26 period, the scheme received an approved outlay of ₹194.87 crore, with a target of establishing 125 LBIs (MoMSME, 2022). Separately, the ASPIRE Fund of Funds, managed by the Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI), has a corpus of ₹310 crore to facilitate investment in eligible start-ups.

Despite the expansion of the incubation network, differences in beneficiary coverage indicate variations in implementation across states. For instance, Jharkhand has two approved LBIs and 338 beneficiaries recorded as trained, whereas Bihar has three approved LBIs and 8,665 beneficiaries. Such differences suggest that the number of approved incubators alone may not adequately reflect the extent of training and outreach. Further investigation into incubator capacity, utilisation and local implementation conditions would help explain these variations.

Since FY 2022-23, the scheme has enabled entrepreneurship opportunities for more than 28,500 women across the country, reflecting its growing role in expanding women’s participation in enterprise creation. At the same time, ASPIRE has reached over 8,700 SC beneficiaries, above 9,600 ST beneficiaries and more than 17,600 OBC beneficiaries, helping make entrepreneurship more inclusive and accessible (Press Information Bureau, 2026).

The state-wise distribution of approved LBIs and beneficiaries trained is presented below.

Table 2: State-wise Distribution of Approved LBIs and Beneficiaries Trained under ASPIRE

Source: Ministry of MSME, ASPIRE Performance Smartboard⁠, as of 1 October 2026.

The state-wise data reveal considerable variation in beneficiary coverage. Uttar Pradesh records the highest number of beneficiaries trained, at 15,273, followed by Maharashtra (10,836), Tamil Nadu (9,729), Kerala (8,891), Telangana (8,770) and Bihar (8,665). The five states with the largest beneficiary numbers together account for approximately 43% of the total beneficiaries trained, indicating that training activity is concentrated in a relatively limited group of states.

The Ministry’s Annual Report for 2025–26 provides additional outcome indicators. As of 31 December 2025, 109 LBIs and 22 TBIs had been approved, while 82 LBIs and 14 TBIs were functional. The 82 functional LBIs had trained 1,16,801 beneficiaries, of whom 18,044 were self-employed and 13,843 were employed in the agro-rural sector. According to the Press Information Bureau by June 2026, the scheme has trained over 1.23 lakh beneficiaries. Since FY 2022–23, ASPIRE-supported incubators have also facilitated the establishment of over 1,200 micro-enterprises nationwide.

These figures demonstrate that ASPIRE’s implementation has moved beyond simply establishing incubators towards measurable training, employment and enterprise outcomes.

Impact

1. Employment generation :

The scheme seeks to promote rural employment by linking skill development with self-employment and enterprise creation. According to the Ministry of MSME’s Annual Report 2025–26, as of 31 December 2025, 18,044 beneficiaries were self-employed and 13,843 were employed in the agro-rural sector. These outcomes indicate that the scheme has supported both entrepreneurial activity and wage employment.

2. Social inclusivity and women empowerment:

The scheme has successfully funded and incubated women’s self-help groups (SHGs) and individual women entrepreneurs, giving them financial independence. A substantial percentage of the scheme’s funds and training slots are systematically allocated to Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and micro-entrepreneurs from backward regions. Since FY 2022–23, ASPIRE has supported entrepreneurship opportunities for over 28,500 women, 8,700 SC beneficiaries, 9,600 ST beneficiaries and 17,600 OBC beneficiaries, promoting inclusive rural entrepreneurship (Press Information Bureau, 2026).

3. Rural industrialisation:

The scheme supports rural industrialisation by encouraging micro-enterprise development and non-farm livelihood opportunities. The Ministry reported 1,150 micro-enterprises supported or established as of 31 December 2025. These enterprises can strengthen local production networks and diversify rural livelihoods.

Emerging Issues

1. Gap between approved and functional LBIs:

As of December 2025, 109 LBIs had been approved, of which only 82 were functional.  This indicates a gap between institutional approval and operationalisation. Potential reasons for this gap can be infrastructure constraints, delays in fund disbursement, staffing shortages and administrative bottlenecks. Understanding these factors is essential for improving the scheme’s implementation.

2. Uneven geographical performance:

The Ministry of MSME’s state-wise ASPIRE dashboard indicates considerable variation in the number of beneficiaries trained across states. These variations raise questions about differences in institutional capacity and implementation effectiveness. Further state-level analysis is therefore necessary to understand the factors contributing to these geographical disparities.

3. Converting training into sustainable enterprises:

Although ASPIRE supports technical training and incubation, establishing a successful enterprise also requires business-planning skills, financial literacy and regulatory knowledge. The difference between the number of beneficiaries trained and the number of enterprises established raises questions about how effectively training translates into sustainable entrepreneurship. Some beneficiaries may enter wage employment rather than establishing their own enterprises, highlighting the need for more reliable outcome data.

4. Need for long term monitoring:

Assessing ASPIRE’s effectiveness requires more than tracking the number of incubators established and beneficiaries trained. The scheme’s appraisal documents have highlighted the importance of strengthening monitoring through key performance indicators (KPIs) and a live dashboard. Indicators such as enterprise survival rates, employment generation, changes in beneficiary income and access to formal credit, could provide a clearer picture of its long-term outcomes.

5. Limited market access and enterprise support:

Enterprise creation alone does not guarantee sustainability. Rural entrepreneurs may face constraints in accessing markets, technology, transportation and formal financial institutions. These barriers can limit enterprise growth and sustainability, even after beneficiaries complete training.

6. Lack of post-incubation working capital and credit linkages:

Although ASPIRE provides training and incubation support, entrepreneurs may face difficulties accessing working capital and formal credit after completing incubation. Strengthening financial linkages and integrating ASPIRE-supported enterprises with Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) and the Government e-Marketplace (GeM)  could improve access to digital markets and government procurement opportunities. 

Way Forward

The effectiveness of the ASPIRE scheme depends on its ability to translate entrepreneurship training into sustainable enterprises, employment and rural livelihoods. Strengthening incubation infrastructure, improving post-training support, addressing geographical disparities and enhancing accountability can help improve the scheme’s effectiveness.

1. Strengthening the Operational Capacity of LBIs:

Periodic assessments should identify constraints related to infrastructure, funding and operational capacity. Improving the utilisation of existing incubators would help expand beneficiary outreach and enhance implementation efficiency.

2. Enhancing Post-Training Support:

Entrepreneurship support should extend beyond technical training to include business planning, financial literacy and regulatory compliance. Stronger linkages with financial institutions and market-access platforms can help beneficiaries access credit, working capital and marketing opportunities.

3. Promoting Geographical Equity:

State-wise and district-level assessments should identify underserved regions and tailor interventions to local entrepreneurial needs. Promoting locally relevant agro-based enterprises and rural industries could generate additional livelihood opportunities.

4. Adopting Outcome-Based Monitoring:

Monitoring should extend beyond the number of incubators established and beneficiaries trained. Tracking enterprise creation, employment generation, changes in beneficiary income and business survival would help assess whether the scheme translates into sustainable economic outcomes.

5. Strengthening Market and Institutional Linkages:

Better coordination between ASPIRE, financial institutions, marketing platforms, and other MSME programmes could provide entrepreneurs with more integrated support. This could improve access to credit, technology and markets, helping rural enterprises sustain and expand their operations.

References

1. Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. (2022). Revised operational guidelines for ASPIRE: A scheme for promotion of innovation, rural industry and entrepreneurship. https://aspire.msme.gov.in/WriteReadData/DocumentFile/ASPIRE_NEW.pdf
2. Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. (2023). Annual report 2022–23. https://dcmsme.gov.in/MSMEANNUALREPORT2022-23ENGLISH.pdf
3. Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. (2023, December 12). Revised operational guidelines for ASPIRE: A scheme for promotion of innovation, rural industry and entrepreneurship. https://aspire.msme.gov.in/WriteReadData/DocumentFile/ASPIRE_NEW.pdf
4. Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. (2025). Annual report 2024–25. https://www.msme.gov.in/static/uploads/2025/06/cdd1fa9e3553498f59e6fef26bcc34b4.pdf 
5. Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. (2026). Annual report 2025–26. https://www.msme.gov.in/static/uploads/2026/05/1bfda06b460e72543530b40817573495.pdf
6. Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. (2025, December 16). The government implements ASPIRE (a scheme for promotion of innovation, rural industry, and entrepreneurship) to promote entrepreneurship and livelihood opportunities in rural areas. Press Information Bureau. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2204536&reg=3&lang=1
7. Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. (n.d.). A scheme for promotion of innovation, rural industry and entrepreneurship (ASPIRE). https://aspire.msme.gov.in/ASPIRE/AFHome.aspx](https://aspire.msme.gov.in/ASPIRE/AFHome.aspx
8. Small Industries Development Bank of India. (2025). Annual report 2024–25. https://www.sidbi.in/annualreport/AnnualReport202425/pdf/Part-I.pdf
9. Small Industries Development Bank of India. (2025). Annual report 2024–25: Business performance. https://www.sidbi.in/annualreport/AnnualReport202425/business-performance.
10. Press Information Bureau. (2026, June 26). From job seekers to job creators: The ASPIRE story. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India.https://www.pib.gov.in/FeaturesDeatils.aspx?id=159051 

About the Contributor

Aditi Natasha Bhuinyan is an Economics postgraduate from the Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, with research interests in public policy, development economics, governance and environmental sustainability. With experience in empirical analysis and data-driven research, she is keen to explore how evidence-based research can inform policy solutions to contemporary development challenges.

Acknowledgments

The author sincerely expresses gratitude to the reviewers Arjya and Ravirala, and the IMPRI team for their expert guidance and constructive feedback throughout the process.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or positions of IMPRI (Impact and Policy Research Institute) or any other affiliated organisation.

Read more at IMPRI:

90 Days, Many Apps: Why India’s New Gig-Worker Safety Net May Miss the Workers It’s Meant For

Beyond the Shock: Why Household Capacities Matter for Rural Resilience in Thailand and Vietnam.