Policy Update
Tanisha Hooda
Background
The textile and apparel industry is an important part of India’s economy, contributing to employment, exports and industrial development. However, the sector faces several challenges, including gaps in production capacity, limited integration across different stages of the value chain, raw-material constraints, technological gaps and barriers to accessing international markets. Addressing these issues requires better coordination between the government, industry associations, research institutions and other stakeholders.
To facilitate this coordination, the Development Council for Textile Industry (DCTI) was constituted as an apex consultative platform to advise the Government on the orderly growth and development of the textile industry. Its first meeting was held on 6 October 2026 at Vigyan Bhawan, New Delhi, under the chairpersonship of Smt. Neelam Shami Rao, Secretary, Ministry of Textiles. The meeting brought together representatives from industry associations, export promotion councils, research associations, state governments and other sector experts to discuss the key challenges and future priorities of the industry.
The discussions focused on improving production and productivity, strengthening research and development, expanding textile exports, ensuring the availability of raw materials, and encouraging investment, skill development and sustainable production practices. Particular attention was given to modernising the industry, supporting micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), promoting technical textiles and new-age fibres, and improving access to global markets.
The Council’s effectiveness will depend on its ability to identify sector-specific bottlenecks, prioritise actionable recommendations and facilitate follow-up by the relevant government departments and industry stakeholders.
Functioning
The functioning of the textile industry requires coordinated efforts to enhance technological capabilities, improve productivity, strengthen infrastructure, promote skill development, and increase competitiveness in domestic and international markets. Various government initiatives and institutional mechanisms support these objectives by encouraging modernisation, facilitating investment, and addressing structural challenges across the textile value chain.
1. Technology Upgradation and Modernisation: Technology upgradation is essential for improving productivity and competitiveness in the textile industry. The Ministry of Textiles introduced the Amended Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (ATUFS) in January 2016 to encourage investment in modern machinery through credit-linked capital investment subsidies. As reported up to 31 March 2022, 14,389 unique identification numbers (UIDs) had been issued under ATUFS, covering estimated project costs of ₹69,160 crore.
However, the current operational status of ATUFS needs to be verified through official sources before drawing conclusions about its ongoing availability. Building on the experience of such technology-upgradation initiatives, the Development Council for Textile Industry (DCTI) can facilitate consultations with industry stakeholders to identify technological gaps, assess modernisation requirements, and recommend measures to strengthen technology adoption across the textile value chain.
2. Skill Development and Workforce Productivity: A skilled workforce is essential for improving efficiency and meeting the changing needs of the textile industry. The Ministry of Textiles implements the Samarth scheme, which provides demand-driven, placement-oriented training across the textile value chain. It also supports the upskilling and reskilling of existing workers, particularly in apparel and garmenting. DCTI can help identify emerging skill requirements and advise on aligning training programmes with industry demand and technological changes.
3. Infrastructure Development and Integrated Textile Parks: Infrastructure development helps reduce production and logistics constraints and improves coordination between different stages of textile manufacturing. Under the PM-MITRA scheme, the government aims to establish integrated textile and apparel parks in partnership with state governments.
These parks are intended to provide modern industrial infrastructure and bring different stages of production closer together. DCTI can provide a platform for discussing infrastructure gaps, investment barriers and coordination between the government and industry to support a more integrated textile value chain.
4. Research, Innovation and Export Competitiveness: Research and innovation can help India’s textile industry improve product quality and compete in international markets. Stronger industry–research linkages can facilitate the commercialisation of innovations in technical textiles and new-age fibres. DCTI can identify barriers relating to technology transfer, product certification, logistics and market access, and recommend measures to strengthen research commercialisation and export competitiveness.
5. Raw Material Availability, MSME Support and Sustainability: The availability of raw materials at stable and competitive prices is essential for maintaining production costs and ensuring the smooth functioning of the textile value chain. Key supply-side concerns include the availability and pricing of cotton, man-made fibres, yarn, dyes and chemicals, as well as access to reliable market intelligence. Other priorities include improving the ease of doing business, strengthening support for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), and encouraging sustainable and circular production practices. DCTI can prioritise specific supply-side bottlenecks, including input-price volatility and difficulties faced by MSMEs, and recommend measures to improve supply-chain reliability and resource efficiency.
Performance
The following indicators provide a baseline overview of India’s textile sector and selected government support mechanisms. They should not be interpreted as outcomes directly attributable to DCTI, as the Council has only recently begun functioning.
1. Overall Export Performance of India’s Textile Sector: Despite fluctuations during the intervening years, India’s textile, apparel and handicraft exports increased from ₹2,49,250 crore in 2019–20 to ₹3,25,339 crore in 2025–26. The 2025–26 figure was approximately 1.8% higher than in 2024–25.
Figure 1: India’s Textile, Apparel and Handicraft Exports, 2019–20 to 2025–26

Source: Ministry of Textiles, Government of India, Press Information Bureau (PIB), “Garment Exports,” 11 August 2026.
2. State-Wise Export Performance: Exports of textiles, apparel and handicrafts are concentrated in a few major exporting states. Tamil Nadu recorded the highest exports in 2025–26 at ₹68,792 crore, followed by Gujarat at ₹50,947 crore. Uttar Pradesh also recorded an increase, from ₹28,464 crore in 2023–24 to ₹34,829 crore in 2025–26. These differences highlight the importance of regional production clusters, infrastructure and export facilitation.
Figure 2: State-Wise Textile, Apparel and Handicraft Exports, 2019–20 to 2025–26

Source: Ministry of Textiles, Government of India, Press Information Bureau (PIB), “Garment Exports,” 11 August 2026.
Tamil Nadu maintained the highest export values throughout the period, while Gujarat showed an overall upward trend despite fluctuations. Haryana and Uttar Pradesh recorded growth in recent years, whereas Maharashtra’s exports remained comparatively stable after 2021–22.
3. District-Wise Concentration of Textile Exports: Textile and readymade garment exports, including handicrafts, originated from 548 districts in 2025–26. Tiruppur led with exports of ₹38,677 crore, followed by Gautam Buddha Nagar at ₹21,095 crore and Bengaluru Urban at ₹16,205 crore. The concentration of exports in particular districts highlights the importance of established industrial clusters and the potential for improving infrastructure and market access in other regions.
Figure 3: Top 10 Textile, Apparel and Handicraft Exporting Districts in India, 2025–26

Source: Ministry of Textiles, Government of India, Press Information Bureau (PIB), “Garment Exports,” 11 August 2026.
4. Textile MSME Closures and Employment Impact: According to the Ministry of Textiles’ written reply to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 3864, between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2026, 7,894 textile-sector MSMEs were reported to have shut down, with 59,374 associated jobs recorded against these units on the Udyam Registration Portal. The reply states that these closures represented approximately 0.32% of the 24,73,634 textile-sector MSMEs registered during the same period. Gujarat recorded the highest number of reported closures (1,402 units), followed by Tamil Nadu (1,309) and Maharashtra (1,276). These figures indicate the scale of reported business closures and their associated employment impact. However, the data does not establish the reasons for closure or demonstrate that the closures resulted from any particular policy or market condition.
Figure 4: Textile MSME Closures and Associated Employment in Selected States, 2023–24 to 2025–26

Source: Ministry of Textiles, Government of India, Press Information Bureau (PIB), “Garment Exports,” 11 August 2026.
5. Utilisation of Government Funds for Textile Clusters: The report provides financial data on textile cluster and processing schemes. Under the Scheme for Integrated Textile Parks (SITP), now subsumed under the Textile Cluster Development Scheme for completing ongoing projects, the approved Government of India share was ₹1,838.96 crore, of which ₹1,536.02 crore had been reported as released and utilised. Under the Comprehensive Powerloom Cluster Development Scheme (CPCDS), ₹114.75 crore out of ₹169.56 crore had been released and utilised. Under the Integrated Processing Development Scheme (IPDS), Under the Integrated Processing Development Scheme (IPDS), ₹214.69 crore of ₹346.28 crore had been released and utilised. These figures help assess financial utilisation, but do not independently measure project quality or economic impact.
These schemes address key infrastructure and processing needs of the textile industry. DCTI can build on these efforts by identifying gaps in existing facilities, facilitating industry–government coordination, and recommending measures to strengthen textile clusters and improve efficiency across the value chain.
Figure 5: Approved and Released/Utilised Government Funds under Selected Textile Cluster Schemes

Source: Ministry of Textiles, Government of India, Press Information Bureau (PIB), “Garment Exports,” 11 August 2026.
SITP accounted for the largest approved and utilised funding amounts among the three schemes. However, the gap between approved and utilised funds was also highest for SITP in absolute terms, while CPCDS showed a relatively small gap. These differences highlight variations in fund utilisation across textile cluster development schemes.
Impact
1. Strengthening Textile Exports and Global Competitiveness: Improved coordination between industry and policymakers could help exporters address quality, compliance and market-access barriers. By facilitating recommendations on product diversification and higher-value manufacturing, DCTI could support efforts to strengthen India’s position in international textile markets. The extent of its contribution will need to be assessed through subsequent policy action and export performance.
2. Encouraging Technology Upgradation and Innovation: Modern machinery, research and technological innovation are important for improving productivity, product quality and manufacturing efficiency. The Ministry aims to build indigenous textile machinery capabilities and promote research and development across the value chain. Stronger industry–research linkages could improve technology adoption, product quality and manufacturing efficiency.
3. Supporting Employment, Skills and Balanced Regional Development: The textile sector supports employment across manufacturing, handlooms, handicrafts and related activities. The Ministry’s mission focuses on creating employment, empowering women and promoting balanced regional development. DCTI can help identify skill shortages, changing industry requirements and regional differences in investment and production. Better alignment between training and industry requirements could improve workforce productivity and widen access to emerging employment opportunities.
4. Improving Raw Material Availability and Supporting MSMEs: Access to affordable and reliable raw materials is essential for textile producers, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises. The Ministry aims to strengthen self-reliance across natural and man-made fibres and develop domestic capabilities throughout the value chain. DCTI can provide a platform to discuss supply constraints, input costs, machinery requirements and challenges faced by smaller businesses. More reliable input supplies and better access to machinery could strengthen MSME productivity and reduce production disruptions.
5. Promoting Sustainability and a Circular Textile Economy: The textile industry must balance production growth with resource efficiency, environmental responsibility and changing global sustainability expectations. The Ministry’s mission includes advancing circular textiles, promoting organic fibres and natural dyes, and aligning the industry with the Sustainable Development Goals. Wider adoption of recycling, waste reduction and resource-efficient technologies could improve environmental performance and long-term competitiveness.
Emerging Issues
1. Continued Challenges in Export Competitiveness: Sustaining export competitiveness requires improvements in productivity, product quality, cost efficiency and compliance with international standards. Diversifying export destinations and moving towards higher-value textile products can help reduce exposure to market-specific risks. Progress should be assessed through export growth, market diversification and the share of higher-value products in India’s textile exports.
2. Uncertainty in Global Trade and Export Support: Global trade disruptions, changing shipping costs and temporary policy measures can create uncertainty for textile exporters. The government’s customs-duty exemptions and RELIEF initiative provide support, but businesses may face difficulties when temporary measures expire or logistics costs increase. The Ministry can communicate policy changes in advance and review support measures regularly. DCTI can facilitate discussions between exporters and logistics providers to identify emerging risks, while businesses can diversify markets and explore alternative shipping routes.
3. Difficulties Faced by MSMEs in Accessing Global Markets: Despite initiatives such as Textile Export Facilitation Centres and market-access support, smaller textile enterprises may struggle with export documentation, finance, international quality standards and finding overseas buyers. These barriers can limit their ability to benefit from government schemes. Practical support should focus on export documentation, certification, buyer discovery and access to trade finance. DCTI can review feedback from smaller enterprises to identify gaps in existing assistance and suggest improvements in its accessibility.
4. Uneven Regional Development and Export Concentration: Although textile and handicraft products were exported from more than 500 districts in 2025–26, regional differences in infrastructure, connectivity, skills and investment may affect export participation. Targeted support for emerging textile clusters and districts with weaker industrial infrastructure could help address regional disparities in production and export participation. State governments can prioritise local infrastructure, logistics and skill development in emerging textile centres. DCTI can facilitate knowledge-sharing between established clusters and less-developed regions, with progress assessed through regional investment, export participation and employment indicators.
5. Need for Better Policy Coordination and Monitoring: The government has several initiatives for the textile sector covering infrastructure, technology, skills, and export promotion. However, effective coordination across ministries, state governments and industry stakeholders is necessary to ensure that these initiatives deliver practical results. A practical monitoring framework could assign responsibilities, establish timelines and track progress through a limited set of measurable indicators, including export performance, MSME participation, employment and regional investment. Periodic reviews would help distinguish implementation delays from gaps in policy design.
Way Forward
The establishment of the Development Council for Textile Industry (DCTI) reflects the government’s efforts to strengthen coordination between policymakers, industry representatives and other stakeholders across India’s textile value chain. In line with the vision of Viksit Bharat 2047 and Aatmanirbhar Bharat, the Council can contribute to building a globally competitive, innovative and sustainable textile sector. Going forward, its effectiveness will depend on translating stakeholder discussions into practical recommendations and ensuring that these are followed up through appropriate government policies and industry action.
Greater attention should be given to improving export competitiveness, promoting modern technology, strengthening domestic raw material availability and supporting MSMEs. Coordination between the central government, state governments, research institutions and industry associations can help address infrastructure gaps, skill shortages and regional inequalities. At the same time, encouraging technical textiles, research and development, sustainable production and circular-economy practices can help Indian manufacturers move towards higher-value products and respond to changing global market requirements.
Regular monitoring will also be important to assess the Council’s contribution. Progress can be evaluated through indicators such as export growth, technology adoption, employment generation, MSME participation, regional investment and improvements in resource efficiency. DCTI can support this process by encouraging evidence-based discussions, identifying implementation gaps and recommending changes in response to industry needs.
Overall, DCTI provides a platform for aligning industry priorities with policy action. Its long-term effectiveness will depend on the implementation of its recommendations and measurable improvements in productivity, employment, regional participation and export competitiveness. As the Council has only recently begun functioning, these remain prospective priorities rather than demonstrated outcomes.
References
Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Textiles, Government of India. (2026, October 6). First Meeting of the Development Council for Textile Industry (DCTI) Held; Council Deliberates on Roadmap for a Competitive and Integrated Textile Value Chain.
https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2319524&lang=2®=48
Ministry of Textiles, Government of India. (2026). Annual Report 2025–2026. Government of India.
https://www.texmin.gov.in/static/uploads/2026/05/5c48e80d2180ca3194b9e9b01340696d.pdf
Fibre2Fashion News Desk. (2026, October 7). India’s DCTI Focuses on Textile Competitiveness at First Meeting.
https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/india-s-dcti-focuses-on-textile-competitiveness-at-first-meeting-314032-newsdetails.htm
Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Textiles, Government of India. (2026, August 11). Garment Exports.
https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2297513®=48&lang=2
Ministry of Textiles, Government of India. (n.d.). Ministry of Textiles.
https://www.texmin.gov.in/ministry
Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Textiles, Government of India. (2026, July 24). Trade Preparedness and Export Competitiveness of Textile Sector.
https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2288808®=48&lang=2
About the Contributor
Tanisha Hooda is a Research Intern at the Impact and Policy Research Institute (IMPRI) and a B.A. (Hons.) Economics graduate from Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies (MRIIRS), Faridabad. Her research interests include competition policy, digital economy, public policy, and economic development, with a focus on analysing the socio-economic implications of emerging policy frameworks.
Acknowledgement
The author extends sincere gratitude to Prisha Sachdeva and Ninchen for their valuable guidance, support, and review of the Policy Update.
Disclaimer
All views expressed in the article belong solely to the author and not necessarily to the organization.
Reviewed by Prisha Sachdeva and Ninchen.




