Vibha Sethi
Background
The structural architecture of Indian agricultural marketing has historically been fragmented by localized monopolies. Prior to the federal intervention, the marketing mechanisms for agricultural produce were strictly governed by state-enacted Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) legislations. Operating as isolated regional monopolies, physical mandis created high transaction costs, fostered cartelised commission agent (arhtiya) networks, and generated severe spatial price disparities across adjacent market yards.
To dismantle these geographical barriers and address high information asymmetry, the Government of India launched the electronic National Agriculture Market (e-NAM) on 14th April 2016. Envisaged as a pan-India electronic trading portal, e-NAM was engineered to network existing physical APMC mandis into a unified, transparent national market for agricultural commodities. The foundational economic premise was simple: enable buyers across the country to participate in local auctions digitally, thereby triggering spatial price arbitrage and maximizing farmer income.
Functioning
The functional framework of e-NAM relies on a plug-and-play digital portal that layers over the physical operations of traditional mandis. For a mandi to fully transition to e-NAM, states must execute three critical legal reforms in their respective APMC acts:
- Unified Trading Licence: Valid across all mandis within the state to eliminate localized buyer cartels.
- Single-Point Levy: Application of market fees at a single point of transaction, ending multiple cascading levies.
- Provision for E-Auctions: Mandating electronic bidding as the primary price-setting mechanism.
[Mandi Entry & Gate Pass Generation]
│
▼
[Scientific Assaying & Quality Testing]
│
▼
[Digital Lot Listing on e-NAM Portal]
│
▼
[Open Electronic Competitive Bidding]
│
▼
[Online Payment (DBT) to Bank Account]
Figure 1: Core Operational Flowchart of an e-NAM Digital Auction Ecosystem
When a farmer brings produce to an integrated mandi, a digital gate pass is generated. The produce is directed to an assaying laboratory where critical quality parameters (such as moisture content, foreign matter, and grain size) are tested and uploaded alongside the lot details. Registered buyers across India view these quality-certified listings on the portal and place their bids through a blind electronic auction. Once the farmer accepts the highest winning bid, electronic weighing occurs, and invoicing triggers automated direct benefit transfers (DBT) into the farmers verified bank account.
Performance
From a pilot phase connecting just 21 mandis in 8 states in 2016, the e-NAM platform has scaled significantly over the last decade (National Agriculture Market, n.d.). As of 2026, the network integrates 1,656 mandis across 23 States and 4 Union Territories, onboarded over 1.80 crore farmers, and clocked a cumulative trade volume exceeding ₹4.82 lakh crore since inception (Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, 2025). However, performance intensity remains unevenly distributed across states (Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, 2025). States that quickly implemented legal reforms and allocated capital to market-yard digitization have outpaced others (Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, 2025).
State-Wise Performance Metrics of Selected Regions (Data Compilation: 2024–2026)
| State | Integrated Mandis | Registered Farmers (Approx.) | Key Infrastructure Interventions | Dominant Trading Profile |
| Uttar Pradesh | 125+ | 32.9 Lakh | High physical mandi coverage; integrated digital weighing networks. | Intra-state paddy and wheat bulk auctions. |
| Madhya Pradesh | 80+ | 30.1 lakh | Standardized sorting yards; large farm-gate cluster connections. | High volume soybean and pulse electronic trades. |
| Haryana | 81 | 27.1 Lakh | >50% of principal wholesale yards linked; robust local data centers. | High-value basmati rice and mustard bidding. |
| Rajasthan | 144 | 14.5 Lakh | 134 mandis equipped with advanced AI/ML-based quality assaying labs. | Leading in inter-state mustard and cumin trade lines. |
| Odisha | 10 | 0.007 Lakh | Initial lag in registration; recent upgrades via mobile-hub modules. | Transitioning slowly from paper entries to live auctions. |
Source: Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. (2025). Evaluation report on the operational performance of electronic National Agriculture Market (e-NAM) across 23 states. Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. https://agricoop.nic.in
Impact
Empirical evaluations demonstrate that e-NAM has altered price discovery dynamics where the platform is actively used.
- Transparent Price Discovery and Realization
By opening local auctions to a wider pool of remote buyers, e-NAM has helped limit local dealer collusion. Econometric evaluations across markets show clear evidence of better price realization. For instance, a recent Difference-in-Difference (DiD) analysis in Andhra Pradesh revealed that turmeric farmers in e-NAM integrated mandis (like Duggirala) realized significant price increases compared to traditional control yards.
- Market Integration and Convergence
Spatial integration has registered notable improvements. Studies examining wholesale price co-integration for essential commodities (such as onions and potatoes) show that post-e-NAM integration, inter-market price spreads dropped by an average of 46.3% (Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, 2025). The e-NAM reference price now acts as a benchmark signal, contributing between 52% and 68% of total price discovery across core grain markets (Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, 2025).
- Reduction of Information Asymmetry
Farmers no longer rely solely on commission agents for price data. Real-time access to regional crop arrivals and top bids via the Official e-NAM Mobile Application allows growers to decide whether to sell immediately or store their produce in e-NWR integrated warehouses.
Emerging Issues
Despite its scale, e-NAM faces several structural bottlenecks that limit its potential to create a seamless “One Nation, One Market”.
- The “Paper Integration” Challenge: Of the 1,656 integrated mandis, only about 35-40% execute active electronic trade. In many yards, entries are recorded on e-NAM portals retrospectively, after transactions have already been settled offline via traditional open-hearth or manual bidding.
- Asymmetric Quality Testing and Assaying Gaps: Remote buyers hesitate to bid on far-off lots because many mandis lack scientific assaying facilities for non-grain or perishable crops. Without standardized, automated grading, a buyer in Tamil Nadu cannot trust a listing from Bihar without a physical inspection.
- Persistent Inter-State Logistics Barriers: Inter-state transactions remain minimal. High cross-border transport costs, ad-hoc cold chain infrastructure, and varying state taxes prevent smooth, long-distance trade flows.
- Intermediary Resistance: Traditional arhtiyas and licensed commission agents often push back against digital adoption. They see the transparency of e-payment architectures and direct farmer transfers as a direct threat to their commission structures and informal credit networks.
Way Forward
To move e-NAM from an administrative network to a fully functioning national marketplace, targeted policy interventions are needed:
- Upgrading Assaying Infrastructure via PPP Models: Mandis should partner with private players under Public-Private Partnerships to establish AI-driven, automated assaying laboratories. Standardizing quality metrics is crucial to building trust for long-distance digital trading.
- FPO-Centric Direct Farm-Gate Procurement: Expanding the Platform of Platforms (PoP) module will allow Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) to aggregate and upload produce directly from the farm gate. This reduces transport costs and minimizes congestion in physical market yards.
- Strengthening Logistics and Financial Integrations: Linking e-NAM directly with the Electronic Negotiable Warehouse Receipt (e-NWR) system will help farmers secure credit against stored crops, avoiding distress sales during harvest gluts.
- Harmonizing Cross-Border Trade Frameworks: The Union and State governments must work together to standardize trade licenses, remove state-border agricultural transit fees, and provide freight incentives for inter-state digital transactions.
Selected References
Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. (2025). Evaluation report on the operational performance of electronic National Agriculture Market (e-NAM) across 23 states. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. https://agricoop.nic.in
Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. (n.d.). Government press releases & progress updates: Press Information Bureau (PIB). Government of India. https://pib.gov.in
National Agriculture Market. (n.d.). Live trading volumes & commodity wise prices: e-NAM commodity price dashboard. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. https://enam.gov.in
National Agriculture Market. (n.d.). Official portal for real-time Mandi dashboard. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. https://enam.gov.in
Small Farmers’ Agribusiness Consortium. (n.d.). FPO onboarding and implementation agency. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. http://sfacindia.com
Warehousing Development and Regulatory Authority. (n.d.). Warehouse integration & e-NWR data. Department of Food and Public Distribution. https://wdra.gov.in
About the Contributor
Vibha Sethi is a researcher and policy enthusiast with interests in public policy, governance, international relations, trade frameworks, and strategic studies. Her work focuses on evidence-based policy analysis, geopolitical developments, and emerging global challenges, with particular attention to India’s strategic, economic, and developmental priorities. She is actively engaged in analytical writing, policy research, and academic discussions related to governance, security, and international affairs.
Disclaimer
All views expressed in the article belong solely to the author and not necessarily to the organisation.
Acknowledgement
The author extends sincere gratitude to the IMPRI team for their expert guidance and constructive feedback throughout the process.
Reviewed by Sneha Kohli and Kaustav Majumdar




