Adani – Hindenburg Report : Epitome of Loopholes in Indian Democracy

Arun Kumar

Faded Technicalities of Supreme Court behind Adani- Hindenburg Report

The Supreme Court of India appointed Committee (Expert Committee (EC)) on
the Adani-Hindenburg issue submitted its Report on May 9, 2023. It
disappoints because it chose not to go deeper into issues that hold back the
nation from achieving its full potential. It hides behind the technicality of
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) following the currently applicable
rules that prevent it from investigating the real issues raised in the Hindenburg
Report. Therefore it concludes that there was no regulatory failure.

Loopholes Paving Way to Commit Frauds for Corporates like Adani Group

However, EC has itself mentioned that rules which could have enabled SEBI to
go into the real issues were changed in 2018 and 2021. These issues concern
the functioning of the global financial architecture which enables the corporates
to commit fraud and provides the instruments to businesses in India to hide
their illegality.

The rules that could track the real owners of the funds being brought into India
were deliberately changed to enable fraud to be committed with impunity. The
EC consisting of corporates and financial experts who know of these matters
could have exposed these mechanisms rather than hide behind the technicality
of rules being followed by SEBI. They could have spelt out the mechanisms and
asked the SC to direct SEBI to pursue the trail beyond where it has stopped. For
the Indian agencies not to know the source of funds coming into India poses a
security threat.

The rulers have created this loophole in foreign funding while stopping minor
funding coming to NGOs and institutions that are doing social service and
defending democratic rights on the pretext that they are indulging in anti-India
activities. Academics researching India have been denied entry on this pretext.

Universities that have been critics of the establishment have been emasculated.
Terror financing was one of the three reasons for the drastic, draconian, and
needless demonetization.

There is a pattern in all this. Behind the façade of democracy and functioning of
the democratic institutions, illegality is being selectively allowed to consolidate
the ruling party’s power – financial, social, and political.

More by the author : SC Committee on Adani Matter Has Failed The Nation

Corporates funding the ruling party are allowed to commit illegality and amass
wealth on an unprecedented scale. Regulatory agencies headed by chosen
officers leave them alone but go after others who need to be kept under their
thumb. It is only Rahul Bajaj who could dare to say that businessmen are
scared. Those who could fund the opposition political parties are scared. Such a
climate of fear has led to thousands of high-net-worth individuals leaving the
country.

Selectivity in the application of the laws is rampant in the political realm. So,
state governments of the opposition parties have been toppled and their
legislators lured with money and/or threatened with indefinite arrest. The
ruling party has been characterized as the washing machine.

Partisanship is evident in the social realm. The PM talks of ’beti padhao, beti
bachao’ and ruling party members mete out instant justice in so-called cases of
`love jehad’ and ’Romeo and Juliet’ to protect the honour of women. But, in the
case of internationally renowned women wrestlers, protesting for over a month,
justice against a ruling party MP has not come. There has been a selective
practice of bulldozer politics and encounters in the name of instance justice.

In brief, behind the smokescreen of democracy, selective illegality is flourishing
on a grand scale. This façade hides the hollowing out of democratic institutions
because they are helmed by ’mitti ke madho’ who dare not stand up and be
counted.

The article was first published in the Mainstream Weekly as ” Enabling Selective Illegality Behind the Façade of Democratic Functioning “ on May 27, 2023

Read more by the author : “ GDP Growth: Less Than Officially Given